Davis
The American Presidency
Third Hour Exam
As with the last two exams, write your answers to the questions below in the spaces provided. If extra space is required, use the back of the page and mark the continuation clearly with the question number. Please read the questions carefully. Partial credit will be given for partial answers so write what you know.
hearings, and sends (or doesn’t) the nomination to the floor of
the Senate
for a vote? (1pt) Senate Judiciary Committee
this official’s role in connection with the Supreme Court? (4pt) The Solicitor General decides what federal cases will be appealed to the Supreme Court. In addition, the Solicitor General decides whether the government will file an amicus curiae brief supporting or opposing appeal by third parties. The Solicitor General decides the position the government will take, and oversees the writing of the brief that is submitted to the court.
Senate for his Supreme Court nominees? (6pt) Once he has nominated
a justice a president may lobby both members of his party, and the opposing
party, in the Senate in order to put the best possible face on the nomination.
The President and his advisor may encourage supportive interest groups
to get actively involved and to testify at the nomination hearing. The
President may go public, using both the press and remarks to selected groups
to help build the case for his nominee. (Party leadership, interest groups,
and going public are three crucial points. Need three points (2 pts each)
for full credit.)
engaged in planning their transitions. What has President Clinton
recently done
to get his administration’s part in the transition underway? (2pt) The end of November (November 27 to be unnecessarily exact) the President issued an executive order appointing a Transition Coordinating Council and directing it to coordinate assistance to the President elect and to make every reasonable effort to facilitate the transtition. (To get full credit must at least have mentioned the appointment of the Council. This was White House e mail forwarded to the whole class. Partial credit if general mention of briefing getting underway.)
transitions. Why don’t Presidents always come in ready and well
prepared? What can get in the way, or go wrong? (6pt) There are several
possible reasons. The two most important are probably overload and overconfidence.
President candidates typically devote every available hour of a campaign
to winning, and if they are successful their confidence soars. Hubris captures
their state of mind and they underestimate the complexity of forming a
government and the time it will take to do so while overestimating their
ability and readiness. Further, former governors may have a lot of to learn
about the national government (though they may not realize it) and very
little time to learn it. If there are strained communications between the
incoming and outgoing administration and the new comers don’t ask the right
questions, the problems are simply magnified.
How would you advise him to deal with the Congress? (5pt) First,
he must try to tone down the rhetoric of some of the more partisan outspoken
Republicans (Tom DeLay is an example) though that will not be easy. Then
he will have to reach out to the Democrats—including them in consultation
and communication and sending up nominations for his administration that
they can approve. And he must put aside much of the campaign platform and
focus on policy proposals that Democrats will find very hard if not impossible
to reject. Bush cannot forget that the Senate will be evenly divided and
the House almost so. He must act as though he is running a coalition government,
or his government is unlikely to run at all.
What are some other elements in a president’s supply of external
political capital?(3pt) Public approval (that is, favorable public opinion),
electoral margin, and overall reputation are all elements of political
capital in addition to party support.
expertise, and energy may influence a president’s policy success.
(5pt) The time clock starts ticking on January 20, maybe even the day of
the election. Every day there is less time to act. The first year is a
transition year and though this is conventionally the honey moon year,
if the staff is incomplete and the new team unprepared or uninformed, not
much may happen. The last year is another election year, and in between
there are the mid term elections. In the second term, the present becomes
an increasingly lame duck. The result is a much shorter time in which to
be successful than be apparent at first glance. Information is also an
issue. Accurate timely information is scarce and many decisions are made
with incomplete information. More importantly, lack of information may
encourage delay, and when information becomes adequate, the time may be
too short for success. And apart of information different presidents arrive
with different areas and amounts of expertise. Former governors may not
know the national policy making system, have little understanding of the
Congress. Former Senators may lack expertise in administration. Lacking
these sorts of skills may yield early failure, hurt a reputation, and time
to recover may be short. Policy and political processes drain energy. As
Light suggests compare the photographs of Presidents taken on inauguration
day, and 4 or 8 years later. Exhaustion can be an obstacle to policy success.
Conclusion, the energetic president who arrives with the appropriate skill
mix and sufficient information to argue persuasively for his priorities
may have the best chance of success relatively early in his first term,
perhaps having his best shot in the second year.
development. (4pt) Ideas may come from Think tanks (Heritage, Brookings,
Urban Institute, etc) university faculty and institutes, interest groups,
the media, federal agencies, even state governments. Parties, Members of
Congress, and the Media may also yield ideas.
may emphasize executive action. What sorts of actions might an "administrative
president" take? (3pt) The administrative president could be expected to
issue more executive orders, conclude executive agreements with foreign
governments, relay more on the regulatory process than on legislation,
to make "acting" appointments in the administration rather than appointments
requiring Senate approval.
Gore is in how each would take advantage of the apparent future
surplus in the budget. What’s the difference? What major position has Bush
advocated, that Gore has been critical of? (2pt) Bush has advocated a major
across the board tax cut of some 1.3 trillion dollars.
has Governor Bush proposed? (2pt) Gov Bush has proposed partial
privatization, with 2 or 3 percent of the present social security tax being
allowed to remain with the individual for retirement investment as the
individual taxpayer thinks best.
Which one of these two Economic units is Gene Sperling associated
with? (Sperling is Assistant to the President for Economic Policy.) (1pt)
Sperling is Director of the National Economic Council
The individual income tax. (Full credit requires individual; there
is also a corporate income tax—though it supplies much less revenue.)
And the single largest item in the federal budget? (2pt) Social Security
But not much better off than Gore will also arrive on close to empty.
If he wins, it will be on recounts and paper thin margins. And the Republicans
in the Congress will be angry, in little mood to cooperate. Like Bush,
he is behind on transition—but at least can make do with Democratic holdovers
for a while. He surely has more understanding of Washington and is better
informed than Bush, but does not have lots of friends on Capitol hill.
Like Bush, Gore will hardly be in a position to claim a mandate. He will
bring more energy and expertise to the fray, but whether he can in fact
be successful is open to doubt.
On the lines below are the four years of a term. In a few words
describe each year and the opportunities and obstacles that it provides
for success. I’ve started the first year. Add anything you wish to that,
and comment on the next three years. (6pt)
Year 1 Honeymoon May be very short this year, even non existent. Normally this is time when the new president is strongest, but it is also the time when he is least informed and may still be filling his administration. By the time he is ready to roll, the honey moon is over.
Year 2 The honey moon is over, but the administration should be in place. This starts the time when a new president may be most effective/productive. But it is also the year of mid term elections, and these may complicate the legislative process
Year 3 Commonly the President’s party loses seats in the Congress—which may make it harder to achieve administration goals during the last two years. It would be no surprise, given their current thin margins, for the Republicans to loose both the House and Senate in 2002.
Year 4 An election year—and the parties may prefer to have issues rather than completed bills. In any case, time and attention are diverted to campaigning, primaries, fund raising, conventions, and the like and governing can take a back seat.
Which of these two areas of policy does the government’s anti trust
law suit against Microsoft fit into (1pt) Microeconomic policy
The Treasury Department, the Office of Management and Budget, and
the Federal Reserve Board and the Council of Economic Advisors (Any three
for full credit.)