Davis
The American Presidency
Second Hour Exam
Your answers to the questions below should be written on this exam sheet in the appropriate space. (Continuation of an answer on the reverse side is OK, but be sure to clearly identify the continuation.) Please read questions carefully and completely. Partial credit may be given for incomplete answers so please put down what you kno w.
Must a winner in the Electoral College also win a majority of the
popular vote? (1pt) No What state can provide the largest block
of electoral votes? (1pt) California
of Third Parties. For example, Ross Perot received almost 20 percent
of the
popular vote in l992, but not a single electoral vote. How do you explain this
apparently anomalous outcome?(3pt) With the exception of two states, Maine and Nebraska, all states operate on a winner take all basis. Winning by just a few votes means that the winner gets all of a states electoral votes.
campaign. Mention at least 3. (3pt) President (campaigning for a
second term)
Vice President, Senator, and Governor.
to final declaration of winner. Work back and forward from Nov 7,
2000(4pt)
See page 50 in Thomas and Pika for a l996 time line. A 2000 time line would be
Very similar.
or his or her own party—and these will be either further to the right or further to
the left than the independents and moderates that are the target audience in the
general election campaign. The message shifts as the audience changes.
presidential campaigns, and may be given in unlimited amounts.
campaigns. It can also be used for advertising and mail that does not
explicitly advocate voting for one particular candidate.
__________________________________________________________
that a Presidential debate might use.(4pt)
Town hall meeting—as at Washington University this year.
Formal debate, standing behind podiums, single moderator.
Seated round table discussion with moderator
Formal debate with questions from a panel (3 or 4) journalists.
post-debate assessments and impact. What are the significant features
of
Presidential debate context? If you wish, use the October 17 debate as an example.(4pt) Expectations are important—how well is each candidates expected to do, and how well must each do? Relative standing in the polls is important, and may put more or less pressure on the debaters. Momentum is important. And immediately preceding events are important—armed conflict
in the Middle East for example, or the death of Mel Carnahan are examples.
loading of presidential primary season?(2pt) Candidates who are
already well known, have wide name recognition. Candidates who already
have money or access to money are also advantaged. Candidates who gain
momentum in New Hampshire and Iowa may also be advantaged.
this year’s presidential campaign. (8 pt) (For full credit, this
answer needed at least 4 separate features.) Unprecedented prosperity,
a healthy economy, are certainly important. We are also at peace, though
we continue to have troops deployed around the globe including those on
peace keeping missions in Kosovo.
The Republicans, out of the White House for 8 years, hungered for a victory—
and Gore was still in the shadow of the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal. Serious
primary challeges by McCain and Bradley effected Bush and Gore, and in the general campaign Nader was a constant presence, effecting Gore in particular.
demographically, the continued aging of the population explains the attention
given to social security and other concerns of the elderly—medicare and
prescription drugs are two examples.
election season framed their respective campaigns? That is, what
is the main
message/image that each candidate has tried to convey? (8pt)
Gore has emphasized his experience. He has also pointed to the s tate
of the country’s economy, its prosperity. And he focused attention on the
middle class, on America’s working families. Gore made it clear he would
fight for them. Bush emphasized his leadership skills, and that he would
change the tone of
government. "I trust you the people." Bush would restore honor to the White House and would unite, not divide.
also take direction from?(2pt) Government agencies may take direction
or be influenced by Congress—especially by relevant Committee chairs and
members. Interest groups may certainly influence agencies. And on occasion
the courts may
certainly give directions of government agencies.
of the President or that of Congress (2pt) The Congress. Why?(4pt)
The President
necessarily has a short term view—4 years, 8 at the most. The bureaucracy has
career perspective and with no term limits Senators and Representatives may go on and on and on. Incumbents are relatively safe and are not likely to have the same sense of urgency that the President is likely to.
The term and title refer to the fact that political appointees rarely
know each other (or the president) before they are appointed, and are unlikely
to know their civil service subordinates. Given the relatively short tenure
of political executives (two years or so) and the near constant turnover
it is uncommon for well knit teams to form. An analogy might be an ad hoc
all star team—a team in name only.
abandoned. Why? (3pt) Cabinet members often have little in common with one another, and may have their own agendas—which may differ from the presidents agenda. Cabinet members may compete with each other for the presidents time and attention, and may clash with each other. Cabinet members may also have divided loyalties—partly to the president, but also to their own departments and perhaps relevant interest groups. For all these reasons Presidents find it easier to seek advice and assistant from their own White House staff.
Significant contributors may also be offered appointments.
Personal characteristics (ranging from inexperience and lack of
information to unwillingness to delegate) may make it hard to govern. Having
another party controlling Congress may make it hard to govern, and certainly
our separation of powers makes it hard. Add federalism and pluralism (the
strength of interest groups) and governing becomes more difficult. And
then add a close election with no visible mandate. It should be no surprise
that the White House may not be able to govern.
the President and Congress. Explain why this is so. Why the conflict,
and what
are typical conflicts about? (8pt) The conflict exists because though the Congress and the President may differ, they need each other. The president may only propose legislation, it must be passed by the Congress. If legislation that the president disapproves is passed, the president can veto it—and Congress may attempt to override his veto. The President can spend no money that Congress has not appropriated, and most of his appointments –executive or judicial must be approved by the Senate. Treaties negotiated by the President may be approved by 2/3 of the Senate. The occasions for conflict are many, and when the White House and the Congress are controlled by different parties conflict is virtually guaranteed. What are typical conflicts? They arise over legislation, appropriations, personnel appointments, organizational structure. Foreign policy and presidential decisions may also bring conflict