| I
am often asked why, as a journalist, I keep coming back to the story of
media and democracy - how newspapers, radio stations, television and cable
are being swallowed up by huge conglomerates. One
answer comes from the former Yankee pitching star, Jim Bouton,
who told me in an interview this week exactly what can happen when there's
only one newspaper in a town and it's owned by a media conglomerate far
from home.
Bouton,
you may remember, jolted the baseball world back in 1970 with his truth-telling
diary of a season in the big leagues. Lo
and behold, as Ball Four revealed to a shocked - shocked! - America,
the "boys of summer" were just that - adolescents with overstuffed hormones
who, when they weren't making double plays, home runs, and leaping catches,
liked to drink, smoke, and run around with, ahem, "girls who do." Ball
Four may well be the best baseball book ever, but it's more than that:
the New York Public Library recently chose it as one of the 100 "Books
of the Century." Whatever is
meant by the word "classic," Ball Four fits.
Now Bouton
is back with another truth-teller that deserves to be a bestseller. Media
conglomeration, like baseball after Bouton,
will never be the same. Turns out the newspaper
in the town near where Bouton lives - Pittsfield, Massachusetts
- wanted to use $18.5 million dollars of taxpayer money to build a new
baseball stadium on property it owns. Turns
out the property is polluted, although the newspaper didn't bother to disclose
the fact, and that the new stadium was a way of passing off the liability
to the public even while enhancing the value of the newspaper's property. Turns
out the newspaper, which Bouton thought
was locally owned, is owned by MediaNews
Group, based in Denver, Colorado, which counts among its 100 "media properties"
The Salt Lake Tribune and the Denver Post. When Bouton
and his partner went to the local publisher with a proposal to renovate
the existing - and historic stadium - at no expense to the taxpayer, they
were told: Out of our hands; check it with Dean (Dean Singleton is the
mogul who runs MediaNews). They
tried; Singleton didn't bother to answer, even when Bouton
sent him a signed copy of Ball Four. Turns
out the conglomerate wanted its own stadium, on its own property, at public
expense, despite the fact that the public voted down the proposal - three
times! But, hey, what's a little democracy
when the only daily newspaper and the largest law firm in town, and - hold
on to your hat - General Electric (yes, that GE, which has title to its
own media universe) want the indulgence of taxpayers for their little profit-making
schemes. The local newspaper publisher, Bouton
tells me, "was being controlled by his boss in Denver. And
the local politicians were being controlled by the local publisher. So
there was a sort of puppeteer controlling the decisions that were made
by the local government."
I'm not going any further
to give away a crackling good story except to say that when his book publisher
received a call from somebody close to GE, the big league publisher caved
and wouldn't publish the book. Bouton
says he was told he could keep half the advance if he remained silent about
the whole affair; he refused and published Foul Ball himself. Rush
out and buy a copy (http://www.jimbouton.com/foulball.html)
and read for yourself how every monopoly is a tyranny lying in wait. The
only daily paper in Bouton's town didn't
want the public to know what was going on, and there was no competitor
to throw a light on the shenanigans taking place between its publisher
and the politicians. As the old saying goes,
freedom of the press belongs to the fellow who owns one.
What happened in Bouton's
town happens all over the country, alas; two thirds of the newspaper markets
in America
are monopolies. Oh, by the way: When
their side of the story was distorted by the paper, Bouton
and his partner got their story out through the radio stations in town. If
Dean Singleton and the FCC have their way, such insubordination by mere
citizens won't happen again. Singleton was
last seen in Washington
making the case for the FCC decision to enable him to own more media properties
- broadcasting and print - in one town. Talk
about silencing the lambs! Truth is, when
the big broadcasters and publishers lobby Congress, the FCC, and the White
House for the green light to merge, consolidate, and eliminate the competition,
they don't bother to report to their readers or viewers what they're up
to. They prefer to keep us in the dark.
John Leonard gives
us another insight into why it's important to keep coming back to this
story of media conglomeration. John Leonard
may be our most prolific social critic. He's
everywhere - Harper's, The New York Times Book Review, The Nation, The
New York Review of Books, "CBS Sunday Morning." Most
recently he has edited a wonderful array of writers who have produced for
Nation Books (www.nationbooks.org)
a reminder of just how much we need our maverick voices. These United
States
is a series of essays, articles, reports - they fit no neat description
- by some wondrously talented writers and journalists commissioned to describe
the sights, smells, and politics of America
in each of the 50 states. But I bring
John Leonard up here because in preparing to interview him this week, I
re-read a brilliant essay he wrote some years ago about what happens when
reporters, editors and critics become caged birds singing the company tune
in the information-commodities racket. When
they begin to have more in common with the chairman of the board than with
the working stiffs who read and watch, journalism turns to slush; pretty
soon they figure out it doesn't pay to cover the working stiffs standing
out there with their noses pressed against the window.
So, yes, I keep coming
back to the subject of media conglomeration because it can take the oxygen
out of democracy. The founders of this country
believed a free and rambunctious press was essential to the protection
of our freedoms. They couldn't envision the
rise of giant megamedia conglomerates whose
interests converge with state power to produce a conspiracy against the
people. I think they would be aghast
at how this union of media and government has produced the very kind of
imperial power against which they rebelled. So,
yes, media conglomeration has become a beat for my colleagues and me. We
think this is the most important story of all, the one that determines
what other stories get told - and how.
This is an expanded
version of an essay that will air on a special edition of NOW with Bill Moyers
airing on Friday, November 28, 2003 at 9pm
on PBS devoted to media issues. Tune
in to watch the complete interviews with Jim Bouton
and John Leonard.
In some markets
NOW may be pre-empted or moved from its regular timeslot due to your local
public television station's pledge drive. Please
check you local schedules at http://www.pbs.org/now/sched.html
to find out when NOW will be airing in your market. We
also encourage you to support your local station during this pledge period
and when you do, please be sure to tell them that you support NOW.
If you miss some
or all of this week's NOW broadcast or you would like to watch it again
go to www.pbs.org/nowto
watch this episode online beginning Monday, December 1. |