| Science
journal accused over GM article
James Meek,
science correspondent Guardian Saturday June 8, 2002 Britain's most
prestigious science journal, Nature, ignored the advice of most of its own
advisers when it took the unprecedented step of retracting an article
claiming that DNA from genetically modified maize had leached into native,
wild maize in Mexico, BBC2's Newsnight claimed last night.
It reported that two of the three independent experts consulted by the
journal after strong pressure from sections of the scientific-business
community had endorsed the key conclusions of the paper.
The retraction by Nature's editor, Philip Campbell, of a paper which
had already been peer-reviewed by scientists and published was
unprecedented in the journal's 133-year history. He said his action had
been based on critiques from three, unnamed, independent scientists.
Newsnight said it had obtained copies of the comments from the three.
Only one disputed the key findings of the paper - that DNA from GM plants
had turned up in wild maize, even though GM maize is illegal in Mexico.
Only this expert had said the paper should be disowned.
All agreed that another finding in the paper, that the transferred DNA
would be passed to successive generations of wild maize, genetically
contaminating wild plants in perpetuity, was flawed.
Asked why he had not made the experts' views clear in his Nature
statement, Mr Campbell said: "Our standard procedure is to make our
own judgments. We wanted to make clear there were problems with the
evidence based on our judgment based on the advice of independent
referees."
One of the authors of the original paper was Dr Ignacio Chapela, a
Mexican scientist based at the University of California, Berkeley.
Confirmation of his findings came last month, not long after the Nature
disavowal, when Jorge Soberon, executive secretary of Mexico's national
commission on biodiversity, told a conference at the Hague that tests
showed that contamination of wild crops by rogue DNA was far worse than
first reported.
It is thought that the contamination occurred as the result of
pollination of wild maize by crops grown illegally by Mexican peasants
from imported GM maize feed. |